✌️ 2 Reasons Why The SEC Sued Binance & Coinbase

AND the 10+ tokens labelled as “unregistered securities”

Written by:

Aakash Athawasya
Tryna write some stuff @doodhwaladaily (will buy you milk if you ask nicely)

✌️ 2 Reasons Why The SEC Sued Binance & Coinbase

AND the 10+ tokens labelled as "unregistered securities"

Gm, it’s Friday ya’ll. You know what that means! No checking your calendar every half an hour, unless you’re one of those hyper-productive freaks who “pencils everything in.

You do you, my friend. 💪

Welcome to the new subscribers who have joined us this week. Every week, we break down the coolest crypto stories of the week. Oh! And every month we give you a deep dive on a hot topic. The latest topic – Why VCs are switching up Crypto for AI!

Sometimes people just don’t like you. And there’s nothing you can do about it.

It’s not that you said something to them.

It’s not that you did something to them.

It’s not like you accidently threw their favourite baseball card in the trash during sixth grade because it stuck to the back of your food tray. Sorry Zach!

If someone just doesn’t like you, you gotta deal with it. That’s what two of the largest crypto exchanges in the world are going through right now.

The biggest financial regulator in the United States 🇺🇸 – the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) just sued – Coinbase and Binance. In this crossfire, over 10 tokens were labelled as “securities.” Many of these for the first time.

But the allegations against Coinbase and Binance are not the same. One exchange is accused of a lot more than offering trading in “unregistered securities.” You can probably guess which one. 😉

Beyond the bad news, there’s also (some) good news. We wrote, earlier this week, about the reason VCs are moving from crypto → AI. Yet, some stayled. Some of them are investing heavily in this particular crypto sector. And it starts with S _ _ _ _ _.

Alright, let’s get into it:

  • 🤡 SEC’s 2 strikes: 2 reasons Coinbase AND Binance were sued

  • 💰 $17 million raised: Why this niche will dominate Web3

  • 📈 Crypto the next internet?: Active addresses think so

  • 🍸 Martini in Bali: But only if you’re a crypto criminal

🤡 The SEC sues the top-2 crypto exchanges


The number of lawsuits filed this week against crypto exchanges by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) this past week.

The targets:

  • Binance – the largest exchange in the world

  • Coinbase – the largest American exchange

The allegations:

🤝 Against Coinbase and Binance

  • the exchanges operate as an exchange, broker, and clearing agency without registering as such

  • failing to register its staking platform, and hence offering services for “unregistered securities.”

🟡 Against (only) Binance:

  • offering unregistered sales of – Binance’s native coin (BNB), Binance’s stablecoin issued with Paxos (BUSD)

  • operating unregistered crypto lending products

  • wilfully evading US federal securities laws by claiming that Binance’s US subsidiary (BAM Trading) operated independently and did not serve US customers

  • misleading customers on manipulative trading on Binance' US

  • engaging in – undisclosed market making, and wash trading

The SEC complaint literally includes a quote from Binance’s chief compliance officer saying, “[w]e are operating as a fking unlicensed securities exchange in the USA bro.”

Caught in the crossfire are cryptocurrencies that were not thought of to be securities until the SEC specifically called them as securities. They include:

  • CHZ – native token of Chillz

  • SOL – native token of Solana

  • DASH – native token of Dash

  • NEXO – native token of Nexo

  • FIL – native token of Filecoin

  • VGX – native token of Voyager

  • ADA – native token of Cardano

  • ATM – native token of Cosmos

  • ALGO – native token of Algorand

  • MATIC – native token of Polygon

  • AXS – native token of Axie Infinity

  • SAND – native token of The Sandbox

  • MANA – native token of Decentraland

  • NEAR – native token of NEAR Protocol

  • ICP – native token of Internet Computer

  • FLOW – native token of Flow Blockchain

Once this new dropped everyone (and I mean everyone) reacted to it in their own way. Let’s look at the top-3 best picks.


Coinbase didn’t do a Robinhood. Well, not entirely. 😆

First – they informed users that their funds were safe.

Second – Brian Armstrong, the CEO, said Coinbase staking would not be shut down despite being labeled a service offering “unregistered securities” trading.

Coinbase has a 10.3% market share and Binance a 5.4% market share among liquid stakers on the Ethereum POS blockchain.

Third – Brian Armstrong called the SEC chairman, Gary Gensler, and…er…“outlier.”

Yes, that’s the word you should use if you’re the face of a publicly listed company that’s constantly the target of the largest financial regulator in the country. O U T L I E R.

He added:

“Congress seems interested in crafting legislation. The Biden administration put out an executive order saying ‘we recognize the potential of this technology and we want to make sure the risks are mitigated.’ They asked the branches of government to introduce this…There is a good chance this becomes a relevant issue in the 2024 elections.”


Binance went straight for the jugular. 😯

First – Binance US was forced to halt trading in US dollars because its banking partners in the US refused to support USD trades because of the SEC’s lawsuit.

Second – Binance’s law firms stated that Gary Gensler offered to become an “informal advisor” to the crypto exchange in March 2019. Gensler, who was teaching a course on blockchain at MIT’s Sloan School of Management back then, even met with Zhao in Japan.

The funny thing is, when Gensler testified in front of the Financial Services Committee four months later he said:

I do not advise any financial, technology, blockchain or other companies, nor do I own any cryptocurrencies.


Robinhood tried to throw shade at the SEC, but couldn’t. 🥲

The largest brokerage in the US also offers crypto trading. But it decreased its crypto offerings by 30%, delisting 3 tokens labeled as “securities” by the SEC.


  • ADA

  • SOL

(Robinhood still supports – BTC, ETH, DOGE, LETC, BCH, ETC, and BSV, yes BSV!!)

But Robinhood wasn’t mum 🤫 about the SEC’s policies on registering platforms offering crypto trading.

Robinhood’s chief compliance layer (and a former SEC commissioner) said the brokerage went through a 16-month process with the SEC to register as a “special purpose broker-dealer for digital assets” but was turned down. This is similar to the experience of Coinbase, Gemini, and other crypto companies in the US.

We’re not here to draw judgment on – SEC vs Binance, SEC vs Coinbase, SEC vs 10+ cryptocurrencies, SEC vs _____*insert next crypto target here*___.

But what do you think?

🪄 FUNDING ALERT: Social media leader raises $17 million

Social media.

It’s not seen as something that can be helped by web3 technology. But it is.

Over the past year, social media platforms built on public blockchain protocols have been springing up. And one of the most popular ones raised $15 million this week.

Lens Protocol, a decentralized social media protocol that allows creators to – create and own their social media presence (audience, content, and data), raised $15 million from some prominent investors.

The funds in this round included – IDEO CoLab Ventures, Blockchain Capital, General Catalyst, and Palm Tree. Also joining in were some popular angel investors in the crypto space:

  • Sandeep Nailwal, co-founder of Polygon

  • Balaji Srinivasan, ex-CTO of Coinbase

  • Hayden Adams, CEO of Uniswap

Lens is not a social media application, it’s a protocol. On it, various social media applications, and content management systems, (decentralized albeit) can be built. And Lens is by far the most popular of the decentralized social (or DeSo) protocols:

📈 Chart of the week: Active addresses reach a new peak

The year was 1996 when internet users crossed 20 million in number. That was way less than 1% of the population.

Now, less than 3 decades later, over 5.5 billion people, or ~70% of the world’s population, use the internet.

Can the same happen to crypto? 🫢

We’re not sure about that. But active on-chain addresses are growing.

An active on-chain address is an address that has either sent or received a cryptocurrency on a public blockchain like Bitcoin, Ethereum, Solana, etc.

As of writing, there are ~20 million active addresses across blockchains in the world. This is a 4x increase in the past 5 years despite not 1 but 2 crypto bear markets.

What do you think the active on-chain addresses will be in 2030?

(We’ll share the results in next week’s newsletter!)

🤣 Meme Of The Week

What else we Grittin’ On?

🥬 ROB. Robinhood removes – SOL, ADA, and MATIC – for trading on its app after the US SEC labeled these coins as “securities.”

🇬🇧 UK2K. Crypto owners in the United Kingdom doubled in 2022 according to a survey by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA).

🍸 3AC. The New York Times details the lavish lives of bankrupt and shamed crypto hedge fund founders Three Arrows Capital.

🇦🇺 AUSSIE. Australia’s Commonwealth Bank of Australia (CBA) blocks payments to crypto exchanges as part of new anti-scam measures.


No comments

Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Disclaimer:The publisher does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information provided in this page.  All statements and expressions herein are the sole opinion of the author or paid advertiser.

Grit Capital Corporation is a publisher of financial information, not an investment advisor.  We do not provide personalized or individualized investment advice or information that is tailored to the needs of any particular recipient.  


No statement or expression of opinion, or any other matter herein, directly or indirectly, is an offer or the solicitation of an offer to buy or sell the securities or financial instruments mentioned.  

Any projections, market outlooks or estimates herein are forward looking statements and are inherently unreliable.  They are based upon certain assumptions and should not be construed to be indicative of the actual events that will occur.  Other events that were not taken into account may occur and may significantly affect the returns or performance of the securities discussed herein.  The information provided herein is based on matters as they exist as of the date of preparation and not as of any future date, and the publisher undertakes no obligation to correct, update or revise the information in this document or to otherwise provide any additional material.

The publisher, its affiliates, and clients of the a publisher or its affiliates may currently have long or short positions in the securities of the companies mentioned herein, or may have such a position in the future (and therefore may profit from fluctuations in the trading price of the securities).  To the extent such persons do have such positions, there is no guarantee that such persons will maintain such positions.

Neither the publisher nor any of its affiliates accepts any liability whatsoever for any direct or consequential loss howsoever arising, directly or indirectly, from any use of the information contained herein.

By using the Site or any affiliated social media account, you are indicating your consent and agreement to this disclaimer and our terms of use. Unauthorized reproduction of this newsletter or its contents by photocopy, facsimile or any other means is illegal and punishable by law.

For Full Terms of Use Click HERE. For the Privacy Policy Click HERE. (“Grit”) is a website owned and operated by Substack. Grit is paid fees by the companies that make investment offerings on this website. Be aware that payment of these fees may put Grit in a conflict of interest with the investor. By accessing this website or any page thereof, you agree to be bound by the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy, in effect at the time you access this website or any page thereof. The Terms of Use and Privacy Policy may be amended from time to time. Nothing on this website shall constitute an offer to sell, or a solicitation of an offer to buy or subscribe for, any securities to any person in any jurisdiction where such an offer or solicitation is against the law or to anyone to whom it is unlawful to make such offer or solicitation. Grit is not an underwriter, broker-dealer, Title III crowdfunding portal or a valuation service and does not engage in any activities requiring any such registration. Grit does not provide advice on investments or structure transactions. Offerings made under Regulation A under the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) are available to U.S. investors who are “accredited investors” as defined by Rule 501 of Regulation D under the Securities Act well as non-accredited investors, who are subject to certain investment limitations as set forth in Regulation A under the Securities Act. In order to invest in Regulation A offerings, investors may be asked to fill out a certification and provide necessary documentation as proof of your income and/or net worth to verify that you are qualified to invest in offerings posted on this website. All securities listed on this site are being offered by, and all information included on this site is the responsibility of, the applicable issuer of such securities. Grit does not verify the adequacy, accuracy or completeness of any information. Neither Grit nor any of its officers, directors, agents and employees makes any warranty, express or implied, of any kind whatsoever related to the adequacy, accuracy, valuations of securities or completeness of any information on this site or the use of information on this site. Neither Grit nor any of its directors, officers, employees, representatives, affiliates or agents shall have any liability whatsoever arising from any error or incompleteness of fact, or lack of care in the preparation of, any of the materials posted on this website. Investing in securities, especially those issued by start-up companies, involves substantial risk. investors should be able to bear the loss of their entire investment and should make their own determination of whether or not to make any investment based on their own independent evaluation and analysis.