From Coast to Coast: The Trial of Kevin Spacey Day 1
From coast to coast, from country to country, Kevin Spacey leaves a trail of young boys and men who say he touched them without their consent
By: @HansPalmstruch
Known Epstein, Clinton and Maxwell conspirator Kevin Spacey (represented in court documents by his full legal name “Kevin Spacey Fowler” in efforts to avoid gathering further attention) entered SDNY Courthouse on the 9th of December to face multiple accusations of child sex abuse.
Prior to this case, Spacey has been accused of perpetrating child sex abuse and inappropriate sexual behavior within his workplace on several occasions. Free Press Reports readers should be aware of Spacey’s extended history of child sex abuse accusations, taking specific note of strange pretrial deaths of three unrelated individuals who accused him of sexual assault; one specifically high-profile accuser was Ari Behn, the ex-husband of a Norwegian princess who allegedly took his own life on Christmas Day.
Actor Anthony Rapp has accused Spacey of luring him to his California home and sexually assaulting him without consent in 1986. Rapp is one of two accusers alleging abuse from Spacey in this case. Another individual (who identified themselves as “C.D”) intended to keep their identity confidential but has been ordered by the judge to reveal themselves. This is especially worrisome due to the strange circumstances that resulted in the deaths of Spacey’s other victims (prosecution has just cause to request witness protection measures).
Scrutiny of Judge Kaplan’s denial of this accuser’s request for anonymity is evident, the courts failure to protect victims of Spacey’s previously, and several instances of the defense exposing anonymous witnesses in Maxwell’s trial. The U.S legal system is demonstrating they do not value victim or accuser safety in the slightest. A federal judge ruled last week that the man identified in court documents as C.D. who alleged Spacey sexually assaulted him in 1986 (when he was 14) must reveal his identity publicly. Spacey’s lawyers argued “He shouldn’t be permitted to proceed anonymously.”
Spacey claimed that his actions constituted "deeply inappropriate drunken behavior" but denied accusations of sexual abuse. After Rapp made these allegations, Spacey responded stating "I honestly do not remember the encounter."
Court proceedings would commence as the session would act to establish grounds for further discovery. Spacey’s defense team made no comment as to the claim that their client had raped a 14-year-old child, instead focusing on establishing conditions of relevant discovery. Spacey’s defense team argued that there should be absolutely no inquiry into the past relationships of Spacey or his sex life, claiming these details were unrelated. Rapp’s defense stated firmly that if testimony related to a relevant instance of illegal behavior is entered into the court room; it should be discussed. Proceedings would continue with Spacey’s defense lawyer attempting to mis-characterize his clients alleged crimes, yet not denying them, stating, “He's only alleging that Mr. Fowler [Kevin Spacey] picked him up and dropped him. It's essentially child abuse, not sexual assault.” Spacey’s defense team failed to address Rapp’s claim that Spacey proceeded to climb on top of him without consent in any capacity (which implies an inappropriate sexual act took place).
Rapp's lawyer made a statement that provided insight into the established patterns of abuse present in Spacey’s history “From coast to coast, from country to country, Kevin Spacey leaves a trail of young boys and men who say he touched them without their consent.”
Spacey's lawyer responded to Spacey’s defense arguing it made little sense to claim that “Spacey throwing a 14-year-old boy on a bed and getting on top of him is not sexual, it's just child abuse. It's absurd. We want to depose Evan Lowenstein. He became Mr. Spacey's traveling companion.” This suggests Rapp’s lawyer think Lowenstein may have critical testimony pertaining to Spacey’s history of child sex abuse.
Rapp’s lawyers continued “Evan Lowenstein's wife got an order of protection against Mr. Spacey being with her children as I understand it.” Judge Kaplan questioned the relevance of this to the current case, although one would think that a parent feeling the need to establish an order of protection against Spacey suggest she perceived him as a threat; but Kaplan seems too oblivious to realize this.
Following Judge Kaplan’s denial of witness C.D’s anonymity request court proceedings adjourned for the day.
According to the Los Angeles Times, Spacey was also recently ordered to pay $31 million to Netflix as a result of a lost arbitration case related to House of Cards.
If you are curious about further details regarding this case see the below link: Rapp et al v. Fowler, 20-cv-9586. Charges were brought in May of 2020. Proceedings will continue at a later date.
Tomorrow the Maxwell Trial will continue; the defense will attempt to explain Maxwell’s readily apparent guilt and implication in the largest high profile sex trafficking ring in history. Full coverage will be available from Free Press Report following SDNY Courthouse proceedings also.
Disclaimer: The publisher does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information provided in this page. All statements and expressions herein are the sole opinion of the author or paid advertiser.
The Free Press Report is a publisher of financial information, not an investment advisor. We do not provide personalized or individualized investment advice or information that is tailored to the needs of any particular recipient.
THE INFORMATION CONTAINED ON THIS WEBSITE IS NOT AND SHOULD NOT BE CONSTRUED AS INVESTMENT ADVICE, AND DOES NOT PURPORT TO BE AND DOES NOT EXPRESS ANY OPINION AS TO THE PRICE AT WHICH THE SECURITIES OF ANY COMPANY MAY TRADE AT ANY TIME. THE INFORMATION AND OPINIONS PROVIDED HEREIN SHOULD NOT BE TAKEN AS SPECIFIC ADVICE ON THE MERITS OF ANY INVESTMENT DECISION. INVESTORS SHOULD MAKE THEIR OWN INVESTIGATION AND DECISIONS REGARDING THE PROSPECTS OF ANY COMPANY DISCUSSED HEREIN BASED ON SUCH INVESTORS’ OWN REVIEW OF PUBLICLY AVAILABLE INFORMATION AND SHOULD NOT RELY ON THE INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN.
No statement or expression of opinion, or any other matter herein, directly or indirectly, is an offer or the solicitation of an offer to buy or sell the securities or financial instruments mentioned.
Any projections, market outlooks or estimates herein are forward looking statements and are inherently unreliable. They are based upon certain assumptions and should not be construed to be indicative of the actual events that will occur. Other events that were not taken into account may occur and may significantly affect the returns or performance of the securities discussed herein. The information provided herein is based on matters as they exist as of the date of preparation and not as of any future date, and the publisher undertakes no obligation to correct, update or revise the information in this document or to otherwise provide any additional material.
The publisher, its affiliates, and clients of the a publisher or its affiliates may currently have long or short positions in the securities of the companies mentioned herein, or may have such a position in the future (and therefore may profit from fluctuations in the trading price of the securities). To the extent such persons do have such positions, there is no guarantee that such persons will maintain such positions.
Neither the publisher nor any of its affiliates accepts any liability whatsoever for any direct or consequential loss howsoever arising, directly or indirectly, from any use of the information contained herein.
By using the Site or any affiliated social media account, you are indicating your consent and agreement to this disclaimer and our terms of use. Unauthorized reproduction of this newsletter or its contents by photocopy, facsimile or any other means is illegal and punishable by law.
patriotone.substack.com (“The Free Press Report”) is a website owned and operated by Substack. The Free Press Report is paid fees by the companies that make investment offerings on this website. Be aware that payment of these fees may put The Free Press Report in a conflict of interest with the investor. By accessing this website or any page thereof, you agree to be bound by the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy, in effect at the time you access this website or any page thereof. The Terms of Use and Privacy Policy may be amended from time to time. Nothing on this website shall constitute an offer to sell, or a solicitation of an offer to buy or subscribe for, any securities to any person in any jurisdiction where such an offer or solicitation is against the law or to anyone to whom it is unlawful to make such offer or solicitation. The Free Press Report is not an underwriter, broker-dealer, Title III crowdfunding portal or a valuation service and does not engage in any activities requiring any such registration. The Free Press Report does not provide advice on investments or structure transactions. Offerings made under Regulation A under the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act") are available to U.S. investors who are “accredited investors” as defined by Rule 501 of Regulation D under the Securities Act well as non-accredited investors, who are subject to certain investment limitations as set forth in Regulation A under the Securities Act. In order to invest in Regulation A offerings, investors may be asked to fill out a certification and provide necessary documentation as proof of your income and/or net worth to verify that you are qualified to invest in offerings posted on this website. All securities listed on this site are being offered by, and all information included on this site is the responsibility of, the applicable issuer of such securities. The Free Press Report does not verify the adequacy, accuracy or completeness of any information. Neither The Free Press Report nor any of its officers, directors, agents and employees makes any warranty, express or implied, of any kind whatsoever related to the adequacy, accuracy, valuations of securities or completeness of any information on this site or the use of information on this site. Neither The Free Press Report nor any of its directors, officers, employees, representatives, affiliates or agents shall have any liability whatsoever arising from any error or incompleteness of fact, or lack of care in the preparation of, any of the materials posted on this website. Investing in securities, especially those issued by start-up companies, involves substantial risk. investors should be able to bear the loss of their entire investment and should make their own determination of whether or not to make any investment based on their own independent evaluation and analysis.