Whether you’re a high profile terrorist, a violent murderer, or a Ponzi scheme fraudster, elite New York City defense attorney Bobbi Sternheim is on the case.

Starting on November 29th, Mrs. Sternheim, a top legal ace for the white-shoe firm of Fasulo, Braverman, and DiMaggio LLC, will stand inside Thurgood Marshall courthouse in downtown New York City and argue that Ghislaine Maxwell, accused of enticement of minors and sex trafficking of underage girls as an accomplice of Palm Beach financier Jeffrey Epstein has committed no crime.

It should come as no surprise that Mrs. Sternheim is on the case, as she has a long history of defending the indefensible. Sternheim has argued in court that some of the worst criminals in the country deserve leniency, clemency, or to walk out of the courtroom free. A closer look into some of her past clients reveals exactly the type of target market Mrs. Sternheim is looking to represent:

Osama Bin Laden henchman Khaled Al-Fawwaz

Jhaled Al-Fawwaz is an Al-Qaeda operative accused of bombing embassies in Africa in which 224 people died, including 12 Americans. Mr. Al-Fawwaz lead a terrorist training camp in Afghanistan in the early 90’s and was the head of Al-Qaeda operations in London.

Witnesses say that after his guilty verdict, as he was being lead out of the courtroom, he smiled at his lawyer. Mrs. Sternheim is quoted as saying, “trying a pre-9/11 terrorism case in a post-9/11 era within blocks from the World Trade Center ensured that Mr. al-Fawwaz could never receive a truly fair trial by a truly impartial jury.” 

Minh Quang Pham

Minh Quang Pham was accused of attempting to blow up London’s Heathrow airport after receiving direct instructions and training from Al-Qaeda leader Anwar Al-Awlaki. The defense that Mrs. Sternheim presented was that Mr. Pham had signed up for Al-Qaeda training in Yemen not knowing exactly what it was and only agreed to the plot as a way to escape. He was convicted and sentenced to 40 years in prison.

Mrs. Sternheim saw not one, but two terrorists who tried to take away our freedom and disrupt our way of life and accepted their money for representation in court.

William A. Newson

William Newson is a film distributor who defrauded the investing public through a Ponzi scheme. Mr. Newson was convicted in two separate trials of securities fraud and mail fraud, each time hiring Mrs. Sternheim as his counsel. Even after losing his first case, he still came back for more. 

Drug kingpin Hanley Gomez

Hanley Gomez was caught in a government facilitated plot to rob a stash house. Mr. Gomez approached Mrs. Sternheim for representation after being lured into a plot by an informant, and she was happy to take his money and attempt to keep him on the streets. Though never convicted, Mr. Gomez has been linked to over two dozen murders to maintain order within his drug empire.

Roeshawn Young

Roeshawn Young hired Sternheim while appealing his 30-year sentence for running a multi-state crack cocaine operation. The appeal failed, and Mr. Young currently remains in prison. 

Juan Rios

Juan Rios, who savagely beat, raped, and murdered his former lover in her Soho apartment. Denise Deperrie was found with multiple puncture wounds to her chest and died after bleeding out.

Mr. Rios was in violation of his restraining order in visiting Ms. Deperrie’s apartment, and Bobbi Sternheim was on the case. Mr. Rios already had open charges pending from a previous assault on Mrs. Deperrie, and was arrested for her murder as he was discharged from a psychiatric hospital.

Sternheim the Vigilante of Villains

Mrs. Sternheim doesn’t have 100% approval rating among all terrorists, drug dealers, and other criminals.

In 2013, Sternheim defended Christian Perez, who was accused of second degree attempted murder and multiple counts of criminal possession of weapons. Despite her best efforts to portray Mr. Perez as a sympathetic figure, he was convicted and sentenced to 21 years in prison.

Mr. Perez filed an appeal to have the verdict overthrown due to ineffective counsel; Mrs. Sternheim declined to make an opening statement and failed to file a motion requiring a witness make an appearance in court. Mr. Perez’s conviction was upheld despite Mrs. Sternheim’s poor legal strategy.

Mrs. Sternheim received another complaint from George J. Connolly, Jr., who was accused of transporting stolen pornography across state lines. As with many of the Fulbright Scholars and former valedictorians Mrs. Sternheim represents in court, Mr. Connolly was found guilty, then sentenced to prison, then ordered to pay restitution for the stolen goods.

While incarcerated, Mr. Connolly filed an appeal with the court for ineffective counsel, claiming that Mrs. Sternheim had failed to represent him properly during the sentencing phase, and that having to pay back proceeds from his crimes was unfair. 

What’s worse than defending terrorists, murderers, fraudsters, and drug dealers? Watching them get convicted anyway, then coming back and claiming you defended them improperly.

In nearly all the cases listed above, Mrs. Sternheim’s clients were convicted and sent to prison, but not before paying hundreds of thousands of dollars in legal fees for the honor of standing next to Bobbi Sternheim in court.

Ghislaine Maxwell is also under indictment in the U.S. Virgin Islands for crimes committed on Mr. Epstein’s private island within their jurisdiction. Between the sun, the sand, defending a pedophile, and her multi-million dollar retainer, Mrs. Sternheim should enjoy a nice vacation.

Cheers to you, Mrs. Sternheim; if you do your job successfully, a woman who tricked, forced, and coerced teenage girls to serve as sex slaves for the world’s richest and most powerful men will walk the streets a free woman. One can only hope that as with so many of your other clients, Mrs. Maxwell is convicted despite your valiant efforts.

Godspeed

Disclaimer: The publisher does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information provided in this page.  All statements and expressions herein are the sole opinion of the author or paid advertiser.

The Free Press Report is a publisher of financial information, not an investment advisor.  We do not provide personalized or individualized investment advice or information that is tailored to the needs of any particular recipient.  

THE INFORMATION CONTAINED ON THIS WEBSITE IS NOT AND SHOULD NOT BE CONSTRUED AS INVESTMENT ADVICE, AND DOES NOT PURPORT TO BE AND DOES NOT EXPRESS ANY OPINION AS TO THE PRICE AT WHICH THE SECURITIES OF ANY COMPANY MAY TRADE AT ANY TIME.  THE INFORMATION AND OPINIONS PROVIDED HEREIN SHOULD NOT BE TAKEN AS SPECIFIC ADVICE ON THE MERITS OF ANY INVESTMENT DECISION.  INVESTORS SHOULD MAKE THEIR OWN INVESTIGATION AND DECISIONS REGARDING THE PROSPECTS OF ANY COMPANY DISCUSSED HEREIN BASED ON SUCH INVESTORS’ OWN REVIEW OF PUBLICLY AVAILABLE INFORMATION AND SHOULD NOT RELY ON THE INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN.

No statement or expression of opinion, or any other matter herein, directly or indirectly, is an offer or the solicitation of an offer to buy or sell the securities or financial instruments mentioned.  

Any projections, market outlooks or estimates herein are forward looking statements and are inherently unreliable.  They are based upon certain assumptions and should not be construed to be indicative of the actual events that will occur.  Other events that were not taken into account may occur and may significantly affect the returns or performance of the securities discussed herein.  The information provided herein is based on matters as they exist as of the date of preparation and not as of any future date, and the publisher undertakes no obligation to correct, update or revise the information in this document or to otherwise provide any additional material.

The publisher, its affiliates, and clients of the a publisher or its affiliates may currently have long or short positions in the securities of the companies mentioned herein, or may have such a position in the future (and therefore may profit from fluctuations in the trading price of the securities).  To the extent such persons do have such positions, there is no guarantee that such persons will maintain such positions.

Neither the publisher nor any of its affiliates accepts any liability whatsoever for any direct or consequential loss howsoever arising, directly or indirectly, from any use of the information contained herein.

By using the Site or any affiliated social media account, you are indicating your consent and agreement to this disclaimer and our terms of use. Unauthorized reproduction of this newsletter or its contents by photocopy, facsimile or any other means is illegal and punishable by law.

For Full Terms of Use Click HERE. For the Privacy Policy Click HERE.

patriotone.substack.com (“The Free Press Report”) is a website owned and operated by Substack. The Free Press Report is paid fees by the companies that make investment offerings on this website. Be aware that payment of these fees may put The Free Press Report in a conflict of interest with the investor. By accessing this website or any page thereof, you agree to be bound by the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy, in effect at the time you access this website or any page thereof. The Terms of Use and Privacy Policy may be amended from time to time. Nothing on this website shall constitute an offer to sell, or a solicitation of an offer to buy or subscribe for, any securities to any person in any jurisdiction where such an offer or solicitation is against the law or to anyone to whom it is unlawful to make such offer or solicitation. The Free Press Report is not an underwriter, broker-dealer, Title III crowdfunding portal or a valuation service and does not engage in any activities requiring any such registration. The Free Press Report does not provide advice on investments or structure transactions. Offerings made under Regulation A under the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act") are available to U.S. investors who are “accredited investors” as defined by Rule 501 of Regulation D under the Securities Act well as non-accredited investors, who are subject to certain investment limitations as set forth in Regulation A under the Securities Act. In order to invest in Regulation A offerings, investors may be asked to fill out a certification and provide necessary documentation as proof of your income and/or net worth to verify that you are qualified to invest in offerings posted on this website. All securities listed on this site are being offered by, and all information included on this site is the responsibility of, the applicable issuer of such securities. The Free Press Report does not verify the adequacy, accuracy or completeness of any information. Neither The Free Press Report nor any of its officers, directors, agents and employees makes any warranty, express or implied, of any kind whatsoever related to the adequacy, accuracy, valuations of securities or completeness of any information on this site or the use of information on this site. Neither The Free Press Report nor any of its directors, officers, employees, representatives, affiliates or agents shall have any liability whatsoever arising from any error or incompleteness of fact, or lack of care in the preparation of, any of the materials posted on this website. Investing in securities, especially those issued by start-up companies, involves substantial risk. investors should be able to bear the loss of their entire investment and should make their own determination of whether or not to make any investment based on their own independent evaluation and analysis.