Search

These celebrities are excellent allocators of capital

And they share a few common characteristics
James Van Heerden small

Written by:

James Van Heerden
Investment Guidelines Analyst at Ninety One | CFA Level II Candidate | Entrepreneur and finance bro
pIXq1pfvG0g

These celebrities are excellent allocators of capital

And they share a few common characteristics

Here’s a piece of advice nobody should need to be told – never invest in a product or company just because a celebrity promotes it.

Duh – right?

While obvious to most everyone reading this newsletter (I hope!), it’s shockingly not­-obvious to an alarming number of people.

However, though this advice is positively sound, that doesn’t necessarily mean that all celebrities are bad investors.

In fact, there are plenty of celebs who are incredibly (surprisingly?) smart and hugely successful allocators of capital.

Having said that, before we look at a few celebrity investors doing things right, let’s first highlight a few bad apples that are most definitively not.

Kim Kardashian

Kim Kardashian’s promotion of crypto token EthereumMax serves as a textbook example of how not to use your celebrity for financial gain.

In June 2021, Kardashian—who has some 330 million Instagram followers—posted a Story on the app promoting the token (which has no affiliation whatsoever to the real Ethereum network) without disclosing that the firm behind it paid her $250,000 for the post.

And remember how we said that the seemingly unnecessary advice above was not so obvious to many? As it turns out, of Kim K followers surveyed in a Morning Consult poll who knew about the promotion, 19% say they actually bought EthereumMax…

Those “investors” were in for a surprise when a week later the price and trading volumes of the token dropped by 50% and 75%, respectively.

Whoops!

In the end, the SEC had the last laugh with the regulator using the opportunity to make a loud example out of the reality star with a $1.26 million fine.

Kevin O’Leary

Speaking of (loud) reality stars, there’s not much to say about Kevin O’Leary that hasn’t already been said.

Nevertheless, Mr. Wonderful’s relationship with FTX represents another example of a celebrity using their influence in dubious ways for personal gain.

In August 2021, O’Leary—who had previously called crypto “garbage”—entered into an agreement with the now-defunct crypto exchange after it “met [his] own rigorous standards of compliance”.  

Of course, we now know that “rigorous standards of compliance” actually just meant a $15 million payday to aggressively promote a company for which no due diligence was conducted.

Anthony Pompliano

Staying on the same theme we come to charlatan influencer Anthony “Pomp” Pompliano.

Pomp has never had a bad word to say about any company he is involved with or invested in.

A thesis without a presentation or even an acknowledgement of the other side of the debate is not a thesis at all, it’s merely an “opinion”—and a misinformed one at that.

For a look at this bias in full effect, we turn to his mindless pumping of now-bankrupt crypto lender BlockFi:

Collectively, these three recent episodes give celebrities a blueprint on how not to conduct themselves in the financial markets: careless, dishonest, and opportunistic.

Ryan Reynolds

For a template on how to positively leverage stardom, we need not look past Canada’s borders.

While Ryan Reynolds may not always get his movie selections right (Green Lantern is spectacularly bad), when it comes to investments he rarely misses.

In 2018, Reynolds made 2 big and seemingly unrelated moves. One was launching a soon-to-be successful production company (Maximum Effort), and the other was buying a gin business (Aviator Gin).

Using the marketing power behind Maximum Effort, in just over 2 years Reynolds fueled the growth of Aviator Gin to an eventual $610 million exit in 2020.

On his way there, he also became a majority owner (20-25%) in wireless provider Mint Mobile (estimated value of roughly a billion dollars) which has similarly received the Maximum Effort treatment.

Reynolds—whose estimated net worth is north of $150 million—has since sold the production company but stayed on with the acquiring ad tech firm, MNTN.

There, he plays a prominent role in running the business, leveraging his marketing genius as its Chief Creative Officer.

Ashton Kutcher

Climbing up the ranks of celebrity investors, few have a better reputation throughout Silicon Valley than Ashton Kutcher, who has come a long way from misplacing his vehicle.

Dude Where's my car? | Notifications | image tagged in dude where's my car | made w/ Imgflip meme maker

Like Reynolds, Kutcher made his way into investing by way of a production company, Katalyst, which he founded in 2000.

Through connections made via Katalyst, he immersed himself in the tech world and into the angel investor landscape, ultimately going on to create 2 venture funds (A-Grade Investments and Sound Ventures).

He has managed to leverage these deep relationships into domain expertise that has helped him arrive early at some generational companies like Uber and Airbnb.

With a few understandable misses (Theranos notwithstanding) along the way, Kutcher—whose net worth is some $200 million—has an impressive track record that counts other notable tech firms like Spotify, Houzz, Duolingo, Skype, Acorns, and Airtable.

Shaquille O’Neal

Rounding out our MVP list of celebrity investors is one of the most recognizable personalities on the planet – Shaquille “Shaq” O’Neal.

One of the most gifted basketball players ever earning more than $100 million during his NBA career, Shaq has made significantly more money in “retirement” than he did in his playing days.

Somewhere between the goofball who slings insults tirelessly at Charles Barkley and the graceful giant boxing out 300-pounders lies a savvy investor whose networking prowess makes Reynolds’ and Kutcher’s look like entirely too much work:

Besides knowing a good idea when he hears one—he was also an early investor in both Ring (pre $1 billion Amazon acquisition) and Lyft (pre-IPO)—Shaq has recognized the value in franchise business models.

He’s leveraged that model with his universally recognizable brand to amass a fortune by simply investing in products and companies he uses and likes.

These include Krispy Kreme, Papa John’s, Auntie Annie’s, Five Guys, and 24-Hour Fitness, among others.

Building off knowledge acquired over a (very) successful 15 years in the franchise game, O’Neal—whose net worth is estimated at over $400 million—launched a fast-food franchise business of his own in 2018, Big Chicken, where the delicious chicken comes in Shaq-sized (extra-large) portions.

Wrapping up…

Looking at the investment journeys of Reynolds, Kutcher, and Shaq, they all share a few common characteristics that are blatantly absent in the aforementioned bad apples above.

All three of these individuals show genuine interest in the products and companies they are involved with. They take an honest approach both in the way they select their investments and in how they promote them.

These are personalities that recognize the value of their brands and have found a way to effectively translate them into value propositions.

This means that, unlike their opportunistic counterparts, these investors are adding value to the relationships they enter.

Something to keep in mind next time you see one of your favorite celebs promoting anything – ask yourself: do they have skin in the game? Have they done their homework?

The answers might surprise you.

Until next time…

-Genevieve Roch-Decter

Sources:
https://startuptalky.com/ryan-reynolds-funded-startups/
https://www.scmp.com/magazines/style/celebrity/article/3107448/ashton-kutcher-invested-early-uber-and-airbnb-and-turned?module=inline&pgtype=article
https://wolfoffranchises.com/shaq-franchises/

Conversation

No comments

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Disclaimer:The publisher does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information provided in this page.  All statements and expressions herein are the sole opinion of the author or paid advertiser.

Grit Capital Corporation is a publisher of financial information, not an investment advisor.  We do not provide personalized or individualized investment advice or information that is tailored to the needs of any particular recipient.  

THE INFORMATION CONTAINED ON THIS WEBSITE IS NOT AND SHOULD NOT BE CONSTRUED AS INVESTMENT ADVICE, AND DOES NOT PURPORT TO BE AND DOES NOT EXPRESS ANY OPINION AS TO THE PRICE AT WHICH THE SECURITIES OF ANY COMPANY MAY TRADE AT ANY TIME.  THE INFORMATION AND OPINIONS PROVIDED HEREIN SHOULD NOT BE TAKEN AS SPECIFIC ADVICE ON THE MERITS OF ANY INVESTMENT DECISION.  INVESTORS SHOULD MAKE THEIR OWN INVESTIGATION AND DECISIONS REGARDING THE PROSPECTS OF ANY COMPANY DISCUSSED HEREIN BASED ON SUCH INVESTORS’ OWN REVIEW OF PUBLICLY AVAILABLE INFORMATION AND SHOULD NOT RELY ON THE INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN.

No statement or expression of opinion, or any other matter herein, directly or indirectly, is an offer or the solicitation of an offer to buy or sell the securities or financial instruments mentioned.  

Any projections, market outlooks or estimates herein are forward looking statements and are inherently unreliable.  They are based upon certain assumptions and should not be construed to be indicative of the actual events that will occur.  Other events that were not taken into account may occur and may significantly affect the returns or performance of the securities discussed herein.  The information provided herein is based on matters as they exist as of the date of preparation and not as of any future date, and the publisher undertakes no obligation to correct, update or revise the information in this document or to otherwise provide any additional material.

The publisher, its affiliates, and clients of the a publisher or its affiliates may currently have long or short positions in the securities of the companies mentioned herein, or may have such a position in the future (and therefore may profit from fluctuations in the trading price of the securities).  To the extent such persons do have such positions, there is no guarantee that such persons will maintain such positions.

Neither the publisher nor any of its affiliates accepts any liability whatsoever for any direct or consequential loss howsoever arising, directly or indirectly, from any use of the information contained herein.

By using the Site or any affiliated social media account, you are indicating your consent and agreement to this disclaimer and our terms of use. Unauthorized reproduction of this newsletter or its contents by photocopy, facsimile or any other means is illegal and punishable by law.

For Full Terms of Use Click HERE. For the Privacy Policy Click HERE.

Gritcapital.substack.com (“Grit”) is a website owned and operated by Substack. Grit is paid fees by the companies that make investment offerings on this website. Be aware that payment of these fees may put Grit in a conflict of interest with the investor. By accessing this website or any page thereof, you agree to be bound by the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy, in effect at the time you access this website or any page thereof. The Terms of Use and Privacy Policy may be amended from time to time. Nothing on this website shall constitute an offer to sell, or a solicitation of an offer to buy or subscribe for, any securities to any person in any jurisdiction where such an offer or solicitation is against the law or to anyone to whom it is unlawful to make such offer or solicitation. Grit is not an underwriter, broker-dealer, Title III crowdfunding portal or a valuation service and does not engage in any activities requiring any such registration. Grit does not provide advice on investments or structure transactions. Offerings made under Regulation A under the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) are available to U.S. investors who are “accredited investors” as defined by Rule 501 of Regulation D under the Securities Act well as non-accredited investors, who are subject to certain investment limitations as set forth in Regulation A under the Securities Act. In order to invest in Regulation A offerings, investors may be asked to fill out a certification and provide necessary documentation as proof of your income and/or net worth to verify that you are qualified to invest in offerings posted on this website. All securities listed on this site are being offered by, and all information included on this site is the responsibility of, the applicable issuer of such securities. Grit does not verify the adequacy, accuracy or completeness of any information. Neither Grit nor any of its officers, directors, agents and employees makes any warranty, express or implied, of any kind whatsoever related to the adequacy, accuracy, valuations of securities or completeness of any information on this site or the use of information on this site. Neither Grit nor any of its directors, officers, employees, representatives, affiliates or agents shall have any liability whatsoever arising from any error or incompleteness of fact, or lack of care in the preparation of, any of the materials posted on this website. Investing in securities, especially those issued by start-up companies, involves substantial risk. investors should be able to bear the loss of their entire investment and should make their own determination of whether or not to make any investment based on their own independent evaluation and analysis.