Geopolitical: Risks Are Major Economic 2024 Threat

In 2024, geopolitical risks are expected to be the predominant threat to the global economic landscape amidst escalating large-scale conflicts and a series of crucial elections in key world nations.

Financial institutions worldwide, as they plan for the next year's investment climate, are bracing for a more tense geopolitical environment and increasing regional disparities. This anticipated scenario is likely to exacerbate market unpredictability and uncertainty.

A survey conducted by Oxford Economics, which included 130 businesses, revealed significant concerns about global economic risks. Nearly 40% of the respondents identified the conflict between Israel and Hamas as a very significant threat for the next couple of years.

Concerns are equally strong regarding tensions between China, Taiwan, Russia, and NATO. The survey highlighted that geopolitical tensions are the foremost concern for businesses in both the short and medium term. A notable 62% of businesses regarded geopolitical issues as a highly significant risk to the global economy.

In the 2024 investment outlook released on Monday, Goldman Sachs Asset Management highlighted that upcoming elections in various countries, including the U.S., U.K., South Africa, India, Taiwan, and Russia, will contribute to an array of potential shifts in the global economy's trajectory.

🎯 GRIT TAKE: The global economy is so connected that… upgrade to VIP to read the full GRIT take. Click below!

OPENAI: >700 Employees Demand Reinstatement

OpenAI is currently facing a critical challenge, as the bulk of its employees are considering resignation and a potential shift to Microsoft Corp., where former leader Sam Altman is now positioned. This upheaval has been triggered by a collective call from the employees for the resignation of OpenAI's existing board, casting a shadow of uncertainty over the startup's future.

A letter issued on Monday, signed by more than 700 of OpenAI's roughly 770 employees, was sent to the board, expressing deep dissatisfaction with the current leadership. The employees criticized the leadership for lacking in ability, sound judgment, and commitment to both OpenAI's mission and its team. The letter emphatically demands that the entire board step down and that Sam Altman be reinstated. In the event that these demands are not met, there is a strong indication that the employees may join Microsoft, as the letter suggests that Microsoft has guaranteed positions for all OpenAI employees.

This situation escalated after a weekend of turmoil, during which OpenAI's board decided against reinstating Altman amidst investor and executive pressure. Altman's ousting was a result of his disagreement with the board on the speed at which artificial intelligence should be developed and monetized, leading to the current standoff.

BEST BUY: Holiday Caution

Best Buy revised its annual sales forecast downward on Tuesday, adjusting to a period of reduced demand and anticipating budget-conscious consumers during the holiday season.

While the electronics retailer surpassed Wall Street's earnings estimates for the quarter, it did not meet revenue expectations.

The company now projects its fiscal year revenue to be between $43.1 billion and $43.7 billion, a decrease from the previously forecasted range of $43.8 billion to $44.5 billion. Best Buy also anticipates a sharper decline in comparable sales, expecting a drop of 6% to 7.5%, which is more than the earlier prediction of a 4.5% to 6% decrease.

Furthermore, Best Buy has adjusted its earnings outlook, predicting adjusted earnings per share to be in the range of $6 to $6.30, slightly lower than the earlier estimate of $6 to $6.40.

Earnings:

Earnings per share: $1.29 adjusted vs. $1.18 expected

Revenue: $9.76 billion vs. $9.90 billion expected

Headlines You Need To Know: 🎙

• Lowe’s cut sales outlook as homeowners take new projects

• Dick’s Sporting Goods shares jump on earnings

• Kohl’s stock drops on same-store sales miss

• US is seeking more than $4 billion from Binance

• X sues Media Matters over defamation

• Tiger Woods' new golf league delayed for a year

• China’s property sector needs more government help

• Biden’s EV push hits a speed bump

• October home sales hit a nearly 13-year low

• Nvidia’s AI chip demand is strong

College Friends Revolutionize Eyewear

These college students disrupted an entire industry.

Imagine four college friends - Neil Blumenthal, Andrew Hunt, David Gilboa, and Jeffrey Raider. They're sitting in a classroom, discussing the exorbitant costs of eyeglasses, a problem they all personally experienced. Eyewear was an industry dominated by a few large companies, leading to inflated prices and limited choices for consumers. This group of friends saw not just a problem but an opportunity for disruption.

Their solution? To create an eyewear brand that offered stylish, high-quality glasses at a fraction of the typical cost. But their vision went beyond just selling glasses. They wanted to change how people shopped for them. Enter their groundbreaking Home Try-On program – a concept that allowed customers to select five frames online, have them delivered to their home for free, try them on, and send back the ones they didn't want. This model was a direct challenge to the traditional eyewear retail experience.

But Warby Parker's innovation didn't stop at disrupting sales models. They also pioneered a socially conscious business approach. With their "Buy a Pair, Give a Pair" program, they committed to donating a pair of glasses for every pair sold. This not only positioned Warby Parker as a socially responsible brand but also as a leader in the trend of companies seeking to make a positive impact on society.

The journey from a classroom idea to a company valued at over a billion dollars was not without its challenges. The founders had to navigate the complexities of cutting out middlemen, establishing a reliable supply chain, and convincing consumers to buy glasses online – a concept that was revolutionary at the time.

Chart of the Day

📊 Gen Z and millennials have less discretionary income for presents this holiday season. 🎁

The author, publisher or insiders of the publisher may currently have long or short positions in the securities of the companies mentioned herein, or may have such a position in the future (and therefore may profit from fluctuations in the trading price of the securities). To the extent such persons do have such positions, there is no guarantee that such persons will maintain such positions.